Next: Modules, Cables and Eta=0
Up: l1joint_1112_eta
Previous: l1joint_1112_eta
Murrough Landon - 12 November 1999
Eta=0 and Other Issues
- Is Eta=0 still an unresolved issue?
- TDR concept has one PPM spanning eta=0
- RX/PPM organisation assumes no PPM spans eta=0
- FCAL and outer EMEC/HEC PPMs span more than one quadrant
- Connector granularity on PPMs?
Implications if no PPM spans eta=0
- If CPMs and JPMs do still span eta=0,
the PPM connectors must allow one PPM to feed two CPM/JEMs
(ie 2*16 towers).
- Do cable bundles of 2*16 pose layout problems for the
CPM/JEMs? Are 4*N bundles preferred?
- If CPMs do not span eta=0, we need 14 CPMs per crate
(instead of 13). Affordable from LVDS and FPGA savings?
- If JEMs do not span eta=0, the FCAL channels will
(presumably?) appear as the outer channels of the two outer
JEMs (instead of only in a single separate 16th JEM).
- FCAL trigger setup more complicated if FCAL is not in separate JEM?
Next: Modules, Cables and Eta=0
Up: l1joint_1112_eta
Previous: l1joint_1112_eta
Murrough Landon (m.p.j.landon@qmw.ac.uk)